Mongrels, written by Stephen Graham Jones, is a novel about a trio of werewolves trying to survive and stay hidden from the world. This novel contains a wide variety of werewolf folklore, but with a twist. Now, to me, werewolves are some of the coolest creatures of the night, as well as the most tragic. Unlike Vampires, many people don’t consider them sexy or cool Rather, they are beasts and brutes and gross. Mongrels doesn’t shy away from this latter aspect of the wolf, but it puts it in a greater context. Also, werewolves just have more personality.
A vampire want to seduce you and drink your blood. Vampirism is about controlling others. Werewolves, on the other hand, are all about fighting the beast within. A werewolf will lose control, that’s a given. However, the trick is maintaining control as long as possible. It’s kind of like sex in that way. Both vampires and werewolves have come to represent two sides of the STD coin. They both carry a disease that passes through the blood. Vampires, however, often seem to have the choice whether or not to pass the disease to their victims. Werewolves, on the other hand, especially in Mongrels, have no such choice.
Mongrels and the Dangers of Werewolf Blood
Werewolf blood is dangerous. It turns non-wolves into a weird hybrid that will not survive. If you are born with it, you have a better chance. But, that presents a whole new slew of problems. The werewolves in Mongrels, Aunt Libby, Unlce Darren, and the unnamed narrator, are constantly on the run. The transient nature of their lives demands it. Wolves are meant to run, not settle down.
I don’t want to give too much away, so I will be staying away from too many plot details. I will say, though, that the novel moves at a crisp pace, and has moments of humor and sadness. Like any good novel should.
What I most appreciated about this novel was the deep dive into werewolf mythology and history. Sure, Jones probably made most of it up based on some research. And yes, I know werewolves are the stuff of fantasy. But, here, he has done a stand up job of offering a new take on an old monster. These characters not only feel real, but so does their curse and affliction.
Plus, I always find it fun to read a new version of a classic. I wouldn’t say the novel reinvents the werewolf story, but it definitely knocks downs some walls to create new hallways.
If you’re looking for a well written novel about one of the coolest monsters in the canon, then read Mongrels.
Have you read it? Let me know what you thought about it in the comments. Thank you for reading.
After the People Lights, authored by Stephen Graham Jones, is a collection of fifteen short and scary stories. Normally, when I review a short story collection, I try to find a commonality between the stories. After all, publishers place specific stories in specific collections for reasons. At least, that’s what it seems like to me anyway.
Is there a common thread that runs between all these stories? I am not sure. I do know, however, that they are all entertaining and spooky. In these tales, Jones presents several visions of people on grief and pain. Sometimes that grief is for things that have happened to them, such as in the final story. In others, it’s due to the things they have done, or the things they left unsaid. This latter idea is clear in the story Uncle.
Aside from pain and grief, another common element to this stories is general creepiness. There are some truly disturbing moments in this collection along with some lovely language. And this, I think, it was really makes the prose in After the People Lights Have Gone Out sing. Jones not only presents us with vivid and gruesome images, but he cuts to the heart with his language. No, it’s not overly flowery or arcane. It is, however, clear, easy to understand, and true. The truth of his language compels the reader to keep reading, even when the events of the story are awful and you want to stop reading.
Jones seems to understand what makes people tick, especially in their weakest and most vulnerable states. His descriptions of emotional and physical places are sparse but effective. He paints a strong outline for readers, trusting them to fill it in. A worthy skill, and one that makes this a must read.
Recently I watched Colossal, starring Anne Hathaway, Jason Sudeikis, and Dan Stevens. The premise of the movie is elegantly unique. Hathaway plays an online writer whose life is spiraling out of control. She’s got a drinking problem, which leads boyfriend Dan Stevens to kick her out. In desperation, she returns to her home town and things go from bad to worse.
This is a kaiju movie, to be sure, but it’s different. First of all, the focus isn’t on the monsters so much as the people in Colossal. Why? Well because the monsters are tied to specific people and to specific places. This approach to the genre is exciting and helps the movie succeed on many levels. What also helps is that Hathaway is as charming as ever, even when she’s a drunk jerk.
Hathaway’s character Gloria discovers that she is tied to or controlling the monster that’s attacking Seoul. It manifests in a certain park that she walks through while drunk. Once she does, she makes every effort to stop destroying the South Korean capital. Unfortunately for her, her new boss Oscar is also tied to the destruction in Seoul. Only instead of being a giant monster, Oscar manifests as a giant robot.
From the moment we meet him, the film presents Oscar as a bit of a creep, but generally a decent dude. Of course, appearances are deceiving, and that is especially true in a movie where giant monsters act as avatars for humans. Soon, Oscar, who obviously has a lifelong crush on Gloria, starts to show that he’s not a great guy after all. He delivers furniture and other items to her, saying that they discussed the things the night before. She doesn’t remember, but she accepts the gifts anyway.
Colossal Turns From Fun to Scary In the Blink of an Eye
Soon, however, Oscars affections turn even more sinister, as he reveals his true self. When he learns of his connection to the giant robot menacing Seoul, he decides to use that knowledge to control Gloria. And that is the crux of Colossal; men trying to control women. The film takes care to present Gloria as flawed but generally well meaning. Oscar, on the other hand, is flawed and full of ill-intent.
This dynamic shifts what could have been a fun monster movie into more psychological territory and an exploration of abuse. Gloria threatens to leave her home town and go back to her old life. Oscar says of course she can do that, but he will attack Seoul every day until she returns. This is abuse 101, and adds a real sinister aspect to the proceedings. This element has more power because of how genial and goofy Sudeikis is, even in this film. He’s playing against type here, and it works quite well.
Overall, I quite enjoyed this movie, though at times it was difficult to watch. I am glad that there was no sexual assault because that would have been an easy and lazy trope for the filmmakers to fall into. However, make no mistake, there is plenty of abuse in this movie, both physical and emotional. It’s well worth a watch, IMHO.
Have you seen Colossal? What did you think? Let me know in the comments.
The other day a thought occurred to me. What is happening with social isolation and the immune system? By that I mean, how are our immune systems reacting to being away from people? This thought led me to another one: will we be more susceptible to common viruses when this pandemic over? I am not trying to scare anyone, and I don’t have the answer. I do, however, have the Internet, which can be a valuable resource.
Unfortunately, I haven’t found anything that really answers the questions I have about social isolation and the immune system. I am working from the assumption that our immunity will weaken. It only seems logical to me. Think about the elderly folks who get the flu from their grandchildren. They may have had immunity at some point, but they lost it. Even vaccines have a shelf life when introduced to our systems.
But, again, I don’t know. I am not a doctor, nor a medical specialist of any kind. However, as I haven’t been able to find much information about social isolation and our immune system, I am starting to think it’s not that big of a deal. Of course, my feelings mean nothing in the face of facts. Sadly, though, the facts are sparse in this situation.
But, just because we don’t know if isolating ourselves from each other right now doesn’t mean there aren’t steps we can take. Before I continue, let me be clear. Social distancing is essential right now. Do it as much as you can. Please.
Social Isolation and the Immune System: Staying Healthy After This
Some things to do to ensure a healthy immune system are things we should all already be doing. The first thing of course is wash your hands. This is basic hygiene, but it is so important. Beyond cleanliness, we can also ensure we’re getting enough sleep. Sleep affects the immune system and promotes good health in general.
A healthy diet is also essential. Fruits, veggies, lean protein are all good foods to eat at any time, and can help keep us going. Additionally, washing our produce with cold water (not soap like that video by the nurse suggests), and cooking our food completely will help keep us safe from sickness.
Again, these methods aren’t anything new or mind boggling, but they are probably our best bet for preparing for the end of the pandemic. Of course, the pandemic isn’t going away anytime soon, and there might be more research coming out concerning what all this social isolation is doing to our immunity.
And even then, we still might get sick. In fact, I’m in social isolation. I live with my sister (a doctor). She brought a flu home the other day and I got sick. It was a small bug, thankfully. But it got me anyway, and I’ve been washing my hands, sanitizing my phone, and generally doing what I am supposed to do. You never know what will get you sick. And I think that holds doubly true for the post pandemic era, whenever it arrives.
Stay safe out there, and take care of your mental and physical well being as much as you can. And look at cute pictures of animals. It will at least bring a smile to you face. And smiling is good for the immune system whether or not you are in social isolation.
Return to Night of the Zealot is a deluxe expansion of sorts for the Arkham Horror Living card game. The set offers players an opportunity to replay the original campaign with added encounters, and extra cards. Before I continue describing this box set, I want to say something. I haven’t yet finished the play through in the original core set. So why am I writing about this box, which offers a replay of that campaign? Well, I have a few reasons.
The first reason I’m writing about Return to Night of The Zealot is because I haven’t written about anything in a while. And sure, that doesn’t really answer the question beyond, it gave me something to write about. And for now, that is enough.
Secondly, I wanted to write about something that made me happy, and this box set does that. It’s got beautiful box art, and provides some nifty cards that the characters can use, making it a nice way to expand deck building possibilities. And sure, the art isn’t much different from that of the original set, but it looks pretty anyway.
The whole set includes 66 new cards, 20 of which are for the players. This may not seem like much, especially for the price point, but I think it’s worth it. Why? Well because the box not only offers new material, but it also offers a nice storage space for all your Return to the Night of the Zealot storage needs. And easy storage is always nice for these types of games because your collection can grow quite quickly, and the core box just isn’t large enough.
Another neat thing is that the box comes with dividers to help with organization. Again, an essential thing as your collection grows.
Return to Night of the Zealot Is Good But Leaves Me Wanting a Bit
So far, I have focused on the things I like about this box set. I have also been fairly abstract in discussing it. This is because I don’t want to go through all the cards, nor do I want to spoil anything for potential players. There is, however, on thing that I think FFG could have done to make this better. It would have been simple, easy, and not cost much. As I mentioned earlier, this set has dividers to help with organization. Sadly, these dividers are only for the scenarios found within the campaign.
Granted, that is better than nothing. However, I would like them to have included dividers for the different classes of character cards as well. As it stands, we still have to make our own if we want that. And yes, I know it’s not that big of a deal. Still, when you spend 25-30 dollars on a storage box (with game components) it would be nice to have a little more flash.
Overall, though, I am happy with my purchase of this game box, but that’s probably because I really like the game anyway.
So, those are my thoughts on Return of the Night of the Zealot. Have you played the Arkham Horror LCG? Have you played with this set? What do you think of it? Let me know in the comments. Thanks for reading, and stay safe out there.
If issue one built the stage for the series, Jack Irons Issue 2 begins to fill that stage. And it does it with aplomb. This issue is a history lesson, which is to say it is expository. It informs us of important events that have transpired in the history of humanity, while depicting how those events have shaped the current world of the comic. It’s a heady issue that does a lot of heavy lifting. And you know what? It nails it.
Issues or chapters such as this can be tricky to pull off. You run the risk of boring your reader with info dumping. And a bored reader is an unhappy one. Thankfully, Jack Irons issue 2 never bores. It does, however, often delight.
How does it accomplish this task, exactly? Well, for one, the creative team throws the reader right into the thick of things. The world has been taken over by the Four Horsemen, humanity slaughtered and nearly extinguished. However, due to our unique nature, we resist and begin rebuilding. I have a few things to say about the Horsemen and humanity’s resilience.
First, writer Cody Fernandez presents the apocalyptic harbingers in a unique fashion. Not only in terms of how they look, but also their purpose. I don’t want to spoil too much so I will only say that I fucking love the Horsemen in Jack Irons issue 2.
And concerning humanity’s resilience: this is a classic trope in space science fiction. I can’t say that it is one of my favorites, maybe because it’s been overdone. Or maybe because it’s hard to think that other more advanced species wouldn’t be as resilient. Having said all that, though, I will say I didn’t mind it much here.
In Jack Irons Issue 2 Hope and Hate Have an All Out Brawl
Maybe the reason I didn’t mind how humanity’s persistence works in this comic is because there is a somewhat fresh spin to it. The resiliency of humanity fosters their hope, which is their only true weapon against the Horsemen. That is a good thought. It might be along the lines of faith in good vs faith in evil, but it’s different. Here, hope is enough. No religion needed.
It’s this battle between hate and hope that drives the story in this chapter of the comic, and that’s a strong concept. In fact, it’s a strong enough concept to keep the story kinetic in an expository story. Of course it helps that the layouts, art design, line work, coloring, and inking are excellent. Take this page, for example:
This is How to Write Visually for the Reader
This is high quality storytelling, and a stupendous example of an easy to read page. The top tier shows a single image: Cody’s, Jack’s drinking establishment. The panel itself is square and clean. However, the art within the panel is sloping and uneven. The slope of the hill on the reader’s left side pushed the eye from the upper left caption box to the lower right. Words and pictures working together to provide a sense of movement and momentum, even when there isn’t any.
The second tier uses this trick as well, only it’s even more powerful. The captions and the dialog bubbles help our eyes march across the page, but allow us to linger on the man in the middle. He’s so big and larger than life he’s bursting from the two panels behind him. And the bottom panel is all warm colors as we see the White House go up in flames. Again, the caption boxes guide our eye perfectly.
Comics is a vast and wild medium, and people can tell stories how they want. With that, though, comes the need to teach your readers how to read the comic. Jack Irons issue 2 does that with ease from the first page to the last.
Aside from providing a visual feast for the reader, this installment also gives us more about Jack. Not a whole lot, mind you, but we do have a better sense of who he is. I still want to know more, though, which is why I backed issue 3. And I loved this fucking issue, as well as the one before.
You can too by following this link. I encourage you to do so. Thanks for reading. If you have any thoughts or comments, please leave them in the comments section.
For the wary, this Invisible Man review will be spoiler-free. Or at least as spoiler free as possible. Nothing like having someone ruin the movie before you even get a chance to see it, right? And trust me, if you like thrills and chills, you’ll want to see this movie.
I’ve heard several people talk about how the trailer showed the whole movie. Now, I will admit the second trailer definitely shows a lot of the film. However, I wouldn’t say these things ruin the film or the suspense. But, I can definitely see why someone would think they do. To that I say, see the movie anyway. There’s enough good stuff that you don’t see in the trailer to make it worthwhile
Good, now that bit of business is out of the way, we can move full onto the Invisible Man review. First, I liked this movie a lot. It’s a quiet movie about trauma and gaslighting and disbelief. Cecilia Kass (Elisabeth Moss) leaves her controlling fiance and tries to start a new life. This proves to be difficult, though, as her fear and paranoia of him continue to run her life.
Invisible Man Review Social Commentary and Believing Women
What I found interesting about this aspect of the movie is that we don’t see Adrian, the boyfriend, as being controlling. By that I mean we don’t see him do it on the screen. We only hear her telling it. Whether this is a purposeful decision by the filmmakers, or happy accident I don’t know. I do know that it works, though. It helps establish Cecilia as possibly being unreliable. And it further adds to the social commentary the film offers. We should of course believe women when they come to us with tales of abuse. But if we don’t see that abuse, it might be difficult for us to trust or believe. As the movie continues, this trust issue comes up time and time again.
This is a fairly uncomfortable movie to watch. Not because there’s a lot of gore and violence, but rather due to the psychological torture Cecilia suffers. It’s highly reminsent of Sleeping With the Enemy. Plus, I mean invisible people are just fucking creepy anyway. You don’t know if they’re there. How could you? And the quietness of this movie really adds to that paranoia.
The Soundtrack Adds to the Suspense
I know I’ve said the movie is quiet a few times, and it is. But I feel I should clarify and say by quiet I mean there isn’t a lot of explosions and gunfire. The soundtrack, though, is quite loud, oppressive, and quite effective in setting and maintaining the tone. Elisabeth Moss puts in a masterful performance, as do the few supporting characters. But this is her movie, and she carries it with ease.
This isn’t a movie you must see in the theater, but I think seeing it in the cinema adds to the experience. At home you feel maybe a little safer, so you might not be watching the shadows as intently. In the cinema, though you are in unfamiliar surroundings, and someone might be in those shadows, or in that empty seat next to you. It adds a layer of fear to an already creepy situation.
So there’s my review of the Invisible Man. I hope you enjoyed reading it, and I hope you see the movie. If you want to talk about it, hit me up in the comments.
Jack Irons the Steel Cowboy Issue 1 is a treat to read. For an independent comic book, it has high quality production, excellent writing, art, coloring, and more. If I didn’t know any better, I’d say this was a product of one of the big three. Image, DC, or Marvel. Don’t believe me? See for yourself:
I dig everything about this page. The action is kinetic, but easy to read. The page has a good flow thanks to Maximiliano Dall’d’s clean line work and page layout. The colors, by Matias Laborde enhance the affair as well. It starts of hot with Jack’s foot klanging against the robot’s head and the colors are all orange and yellow. This heat continues to the next panel. Then, the insert of the crowd is a nice touch too as it provides an in issue reaction to the violence. By the end of the page things have cooled down, as we can see by the fight ending and the switch from hotter colors to the cooler blue tones. The battle is over, the hero has won, but this is just the beginning of things.
The thing I appreciated most about Jack Irons issue 1, I think, is the economy of storytelling. Writer Cody Fernandez presents the story of Jack, and immortal man who is millennia old, as one of strife, violence, and death. See, Jack dies, and comes back, and dies again, and then comes back. Like the history of humanity, his history is one of blood and violence, and he cannot escape it. Mystery surrounds the titular character, and it is definitely a mystery I want to know more about.
Jack Irons Issue 1 Is A Near Perfect First Issue
This is a great first issue. It sets the stage for what is to come by giving enough backstory to inspire speculation about what comes next. It doesn’t waste the reader’s time, and it looks lovely. Furthermore, it seems to offer a different take on the space western, mainly because Jack is a different kind of character.
If you’ve been looking for a good #indiecomic to check out, then this one might be it. Especially if you enjoy westerns and science fiction. However, if you are looking for the next Star Wars or Firefly, this doesn’t seem to be those. Did they inspire it? Maybe, but I can’t say how much. Still, this is only the first issue, so there’s no telling what comes next.
If you want to check this out, they are currently running a campaign for issue 3 on indiegogo. As a bonus, you can also get Jack Irons issue 1 and 2 if you choose the complete package option. You might also check out their publisher’s website.
So, there’s my thoughts on Jack Irons the Steel Cowboy Issue 1.
First I want to say that I greatly enjoyed Birds of Prey and the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn. I also want to say that this review will be as spoiler free as possible. I might let a detail slip here or there, but I have no interest in ruining anyone’s fun. What I will talk about is the movie making, and the themes of the film. Beyond woman power (which is something I wrote about here), there is heavy focus on the personal histories of the characters. Birds of Prey and Harley is about many things, and has a lot of good action, but at it’s heart it is about the characters wrestling with their past.
Harley’s past is most on display, which makes sense. She’s the biggest character in the film, and she is the POV character. And then of course there is the whole Joker thing. Here’s a mild spoiler: Joker is not in this film, and he and Ms. Quinn are no longer an item. It’s this breakup that sets things in motion, and also establishes the need for Harley to reflect on her actions. She is a product of her past actions, as we all are, and she needs to come to terms with that. As we all do. Here’s another mild spoiler: if you’re worried this means Harley grows up and gains a heart and all that, don’t be.
Detective Renee Montoya is another character in the Birds of Prey and Harley show who is trying to reconcile her present with her past. However, instead of an ex-lover screwing her over, it was her ex-partner. Now, she’s older and gets no respect from anyone. She’s good at her job, but that doesn’t matter. After all, she’s past her prime and an alcoholic.
Birds of Prey and Harley Kick Ass and Forget the Past
The next character to discuss from Birds of Prey and Harley is Black Canary. Here is a woman with a mysterious and violent past. We don’t know much about her, except that she’s suffering. She’s made some poor choices and is now reckoning with them. This connects her to the rest of the characters, but Canary’s story is a little different. I don’t want to spoil anything so I won’t say how it’s different. You’ll just have to trust me on this.
Finally, Huntress. Her whole arc is predicated on a horrific event in her past. She’s not trying to overcome it or process it. No, she desires vengeance.
Even Black Mask, the villain, is defined by his past. He grew up rich, traveled the world. Then his parents cut him off and he made himself a fortune. All of these characters are connected thematically because their actions are made in response to historic moments in their lives. This is the stuff of superheroes and superhero comics. Additionally, it adds dimension to these characters who don’t always feel fully realized on the screen.
Privilege Comes in Many Forms
In a subtle bit of commentary, Birds of Prey and the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn addresses privilege. The first stop is again with Harley. As Joker’s gal, she can pretty much do whatever she wants. This is privilege gained through association and fear but it’s still privilege. In fact, it’s white privilege. Now, the movie doesn’t put it in these terms, but that’s what subtext is for. Furthermore, this idea becomes one of the many plot threads that run through the movie. Harley is positioned as powerful, not because of what she can do, but because of who she knows. Yet another obstacle for her to overcome.
Black Mask is uber-privileged as well. He’s a rich kid turned gangster. He has money and control. Again, his power comes from fear, but a whole lot of cash money doesn’t hurt either. In Black Mask we see white male privilege. He sees something he wants and takes it. If he can’t have something he wants, he throws a fit and kills people. Oh my god, he’s Donald Trump!
Interestingly, Renee Montoya is a victim of privilege as well. Her ex-partner, a man, stole her glory. Now, her partner was black, so this isn’t white privilege. But, he is a man, so this is male privilege.
All of this portrayal of privilege embiggens the story, and helps make the movie feel a little important. Granted, there’s not a deep dive into these issues, but they’re there. And I think Birds of Prey and Harley is better for the inclusion.
The Review Type Stuff
The Good: he performances. Yes, we all knew Margot Robbie could play Harley Quinn, but the rest of the Birds of Prey were great, too. Rosie Perez as Montoya was fun. Jurnee Smollet-Bell was a breath of fresh air as Black Canary. Mary Elizabeth Winestead was a great Huntress, even if she had a diminished role.
But the real scene stealer was Ewan McGregor as Black Mask. He was at turns funny, smooth, manic, and always terrifying. McGregor brought menace to the role that really made the character feel scary and gross. Because Black Mask is scary and gross. McGregor was an inspired choice here.
Beyond the performances, the character interactions were amazing. Everyone had excellent chemistry with one another, which made the movie a joy to watch.
Speaking of joy, the action was fun as hell. There’s lots of punching and kicking and other martial art moves. And it’s all well choreographed, easy to see, and fun to watch. If you like to see sexy women beat the hell out of sexy and unsexy men, then this movie is for you.
Also, the whole look of the film from the lighting, the costumes, and everything else pleased me. I loved the look. I understand it may not be for everyone, but it was definitely for this kid.
The Bad: While I did like this movie a lot, there were some things that bugged me. Mostly, the parts that didn’t make a lot of sense. There was one scene near the end that was especially egregious. I have an issue with nonsensical things in movies because they can so easily break the illusion. And that’s what happened in the scene I’m talking about. It didn’t ruin the movie, but it did sour me for a minute.
Harley Gets Development but the Other Birds Of Prey Feel Lacking Sometimes
I know I said I liked the characters, and this whole post has been about how the filmmakers fleshed them out. However, I still take some issue with everyone not named Harley Quinn or Black Mask. These two get the most screen time and the biggest character arcs. That’s understandable as they are protagonist and antagonist. However, Canary, and Huntress especially get the short shrift. As does Montoya, but her character is so familiar to viewers that we don’t require much development of her character.
Some might say that the shortened running time is responsible for the lack of depth in some of the characters. However, I don’t know if that’s it. I think the movie used the characters how they wanted, and would have probably done the same even if they had more time. The lack of depth in some of the characters was not a deal breaker for me, but I did notice it.
Overall Verdict: I liked this movie. It’s not the best movie ever, but it was quite enjoyable. It’s got action, humor, drama, and more. A note on the humor: there’s lots of jokes, but they don’t often undercut the dramatic tension. Sometimes they do, and sometimes they enhance it. It’s really a well-made film.
If you liked Robbie as Harley in Suicide Squad, see this movie. If you love the Birds of Prey comic, see this movie. It’s true the versions of the characters are different, but they are worthy. Does the idea of watching good looking women beat up on people and form a bond of friendship appeal to you? See this movie.
Have you seen Birds of Prey and Harley Quinn? What did you think? Let me know in the comments.
I first became aware of the new film Gretel and Hansel in the pages of Fangoria. Yes, I live under a rock and don’t always know what’s new and cool. Anyway, the discussion in the interview between star Sophia Lillis (Gretel) and director Oz Perkins intrigued me enough that I wanted to see the film upon release. I was especially interested in the idea of presenting the power of women through Hansel and Gretel. To be fair, the Fangoria conversation only contained a few snippets of ideas concerning gender roles in the movie.
Of course, it’s not surprising that the power of women would be a focus in this update of the classic story, and even the title Gretel and Hansel indicate that. Gretel’s name comes first, positioning her as the most important character. This aspect plays out from the very beginning. Gretel is older, and her parents expect her to always look after her brother. In many ways, this is the fairy tale in all its glory. In the story, Gretel does the saving, and the hard work. Why would it be any different in the film?
To get even more explicit about the gifts women wield in this movie, there is a fairy tale within the fairy tale. The inner one, the girl with the pink hat, tells of a little girl who could see the future, and who the villagers loved. This story is Gretel’s favorite. There are probably several reasons for this, but the main one is empathy. Gretel feels she too has special powers, and finds comfort in the tale of the girl with the pink hat.
Gretel & Hansel Power of Women is Awareness
Yes, there is a witch in this movie. And yes, Alice Krige plays her superbly. Of course, it is rare to find a Krige performance that isn’t superb. However, even without the witches, power in this movie exists. It exists in Gretel’s determination and level headed-ness. She is a practical girl, and steadfast, which she demonstrates early in the film. In that instance, she may not have been even keeled, but she was steadfast. These two character traits define her, and set up the central conflict.
There can be no discussion of power without conflict. If there was no conflict, there’d be no need for power. It’s quite simple, really. Gretel and Hansel plays with the idea of power, women, and the multitude of possible conflicts in an interesting way. The witch and Gretel are in a struggle, as are Hansel and Gretel, and finally, Hansel and the witch. It’s not as twisty as I’m making it sound, but it all intertwines heavily.
In addition to innate power of women, Gretel & Hansel also explores the forces at work against them. In Gretel’s case there are her parents, her brother, and the attitude about girls in general. The Huntsman sums it up best when he says something like, “They’ll put you to work rather than use you for more obvious purposes.” It’s a grimy line, but it hits hard.
And the witch tells Gretel that Hansel has poisoned her and will continue to do so as long as he’s around. This is another good example of the challenges women face, specifically men. There are men who will hurt and use you, and there are men who will hold you back. Sometimes, they are one in the same. Most times, in fact.
What’s the Verdict? Is It Any Good?
While I really enjoyed the tension between Gretel, Hansel, and the witch, as well as the exploration of the power of women, I can’t say if this was a good film. Did I enjoy it? I think so. It has good cinematography that helps tell the story. The performances are excellent, an important aspect considering the minimal amount of characters.
However, there’s not a lot of story there. Yes, the filmmakers do a fantastic job with what they have, but it feels padded at times. Maybe padded is the wrong word; maybe wandering is better And there’s nothing wrong with that. After all, the movie is all about quiet introspection. It’s not a modern day special effects extravaganza. Hell, the whole budget was 5 million dollars. A fair representation would be that this feels very much like a theatrical play put into movie form. That is not a criticism, merely an observation.
So, while I cannot say if I liked it or if it was a good movie, I can say I am glad I watched it. It’s a small movie, and it will get small audiences. There were three people in my theater. Yes, it was at 1 pm on a weekday, but it was also discount Tuesdays. That mean’s you get matinee prices all day! But, small movies need support. They need to earn back what they spent. If they can do that, then studios can make more of them. Talk about the power of the consumer vs the power of THE MAN!
If you’re looking for a different take on the classic fairy tale, Gretel & Hansel is a good one because of how it presents and explores the idea of the power of women. Beyond that, it’s a nice change from superheroes, explosions, and snarky quips.
Have you seen it? What did you think? Comment below.